Smart Selector: Presidential Candidate Selector thinger not so smart ?

Interesting. I think I broke their Smart Selector.

2012 President Selector http://selectsmart.com/president Rankings:
1. Ideal Theoretical Candidate (100 %) [No one exists who is my ideal candidate]
2. Newt Gingrich (announced candidacy) (80 %)
3. Rick Santorum (announced candidacy) (75 %)
4. Eric Cantor (not running) (69 %)
5. Mike Pence (announced non-candidacy) (68 %)
6. Sarah Palin (66 %)
7. John Boehner (not running) (66 %)
8. Wayne Allyn Root (63 %)
9. Lindsey Graham (not running) (63 %) [First sign of major gasket failure]
10. Mike Huckabee (announced non-candidacy) (62 %)
11. Mitt Romney (announced candidacy) (61 %)
12. Michele Bachmann (announced candidacy) (58 %)
13. Ron Paul (announced candidacy) (57 %) [Anything Paul postive is amazingly wrong]
14. Jeb Bush (not running) (57 %)
15. Rob Portman (54 %)
16. Tim Pawlenty (dropped out) (51 %)
17. Mitch Daniels (not running) (49 %)
18. Bobby Jindal (announced non-candidacy) (49 %)
19. Haley Barbour (announced non-candidacy) (43 %)

Now it just gets stupid.

20. Joseph Biden (presumed vp candidate) (43 %)
21. Rick Perry (announced candidacy) (42 %)
22. Hillary Clinton (not running) (38 %)
23. Buddy Roemer (announced candidacy) (33 %)
24. Barack Obama (announced candidacy) (29 %)
25. Herman Cain (announced candidacy) (29 %)
26. Jon Huntsman (announced candidacy) (29 %)
27. Donald Trump (announced non-candidacy) (28 %)
28. Gary Johnson (announced candidacy) (25 %)
29. Michael Bloomberg (announced non-candidacy) (14 %)

Come on. I've supposedly more to like in Joe Biden and Barack Obama than Rick Perry and Herman Cain? Seriously?

Needs a tune-up, this whacky robot does.

---