Here we read the NYT's fabled 'Wesley Mouch' attacking Mr. Perry for doing what politicians do best...raising money through traditional methodologies; using the power of whatever seat to assure ease of re-election. Of course, if we wanted to choose a politician who did not create such a structure, you'd find a way to tear her down: Sarah Palin, Alaska's Governor, attacked the power structure of the Office, and the trappings of both political Parties alike; but she's takes the brunt of your put-downs for being...well, not good enough to serve as President (in your LeftLibProgg neo-Marxist eyes only, from your seats in Elitesville and in the path for handouts).
Either Perry or Palin would serve this nation much better than Mr. Obama has; he who came up embracing Chicago-style politics (politics that're so much softer and cleaner than Texas' or Alaska's 'machines'); Obama having arrived via the socialist incubators operating at the highest levels of academia, then following the path outlined by Andre Gorz, Peter Dreier, Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward: implementing "transitional reforms", "non-reformist reforms" to push the United States to socialism (re-branded as "CHANGE" by ACORN-inspired Barack Obama) via financial crisis brought on by the incompatibility of soft-socialism and capitalism.
Well, we are at the predicted fiscal crisis point; there's a community organizer in the White House and on every street corner it seems to help transition us to socialism. Dreier's dream is on the brink of becoming reality. Unless the situation gets violent, and we inherit fascism instead.
And you're worried about a few dollars spent in Texas by a governor who worked the existing system as it's always been done?
No comments:
Post a Comment